This BLOG serves the condo residents of our Village , WPB, FL. We attempt to provide accurate information but such information does not in any way constitute legal or professional advice. This Web Site is not censored, except in the case of extreme and offensive posts. As such, the posts are representative of the poster's opinion only. This BLOG cannot be held liable for actions arising from its use or for the contents of any externally linked pages.
PAGES
▼
Friday, October 12, 2018
BLOG TWO CARTOON DISGUSTING
I find it disgusting that our blog two has gotten into politics. that is a disgusting cartoon.
I presume I have that freedom to voice my opinion? I am a firm believe in womens rights.. You are right Grace I will not look at blog two knowing how the blogger feels. Remember exploiting women is not good.
I am in agreement with Barbara and have recently requested that the name of part two be changed to Elaine's Blog, since she is the only allowed to write on it. and it should be on the side as is mine, not at the top. This is not the village part two. Not at all. Change it to Elaine's Blog and write whatever you want.
Bob there are 29 authors listed for Blog part 2, they can post anytime. I am admin and put up an occasional thought to show Blog is active, C'mon authors. Room for more overflow from Part 1.
Elaine is right that she is not the only person authorized to write on Blog No. 2. I know this because I am allowed to post and comment, and have done both.
I would hope a way could be found for Blog No.2 to fulfill its original purpose, to effectively enlarge the pool of people who could participate in a discussion from 100 (the limit on either blog) to 200. But how would this work? To chronologically follow the thread of a discussion can be difficult enough sometimes on one blog; to follow it jumping back and forth between two blogs would be almost impossible for me.
I can't imagine that there is no way the number of participants on a blog cannot exceed 100 in our computer age. The limit of 100 has got to be a limit due to cost or complexity or some kind of government control. 100 was the limit a few years ago, I understand. Is it still, Dave Israel, and WHY?
You don't have to read or look at it if you don't life it. Isn't that freedom in America?
ReplyDeleteJustice, womens' rights, anti-bullying and brilliant cartooning are not 'gotten into politics', its humanity and deeply human.
ReplyDeleteI presume I have that freedom to voice my opinion? I am a firm believe in womens rights..
ReplyDeleteYou are right Grace I will not look at blog two knowing how the blogger feels. Remember exploiting women is not good.
I am in agreement with Barbara and have recently requested that the name of part two be changed to Elaine's Blog, since she is the only allowed to write on it. and it should be on the side as is mine, not at the top. This is not the village part two. Not at all. Change it to Elaine's Blog and write whatever you want.
ReplyDeleteBob there are 29 authors listed for Blog part 2, they can post anytime. I am admin and put up an occasional thought to show Blog is active, C'mon authors. Room for more overflow from Part 1.
ReplyDeleteElaine is right that she is not the only person authorized to write on Blog No. 2. I know this because I am allowed to post and comment, and have done both.
ReplyDeleteI would hope a way could be found for Blog No.2 to fulfill its original purpose, to effectively enlarge the pool of people who could participate in a discussion from 100 (the limit on either blog) to 200. But how would this work? To chronologically follow the thread of a discussion can be difficult enough sometimes on one blog; to follow it jumping back and forth between two blogs would be almost impossible for me.
I can't imagine that there is no way the number of participants on a blog cannot exceed 100 in our computer age. The limit of 100 has got to be a limit due to cost or complexity or some kind of government control. 100 was the limit a few years ago, I understand. Is it still, Dave Israel, and WHY?