This Is our Village

Sunday, March 7, 2010

1st Priority Update

The alleged uncontained strong-armed tactics of 1st Priority Restoration continues. Debt collection Attorney, Ms. Rhonda Zimmerman – who has also represented, Dan Gladstone, has begun to issue, liens and lawsuits on behalf of her clients, 1st Priority.
For the record, one particular property, on Ms Zimmerman’s list, had permit complete issued months ago, yet still remains uninhabitable. The only thing that’s changed since last year, is the bill, estimated at a staggering $58,000.


Despite Gladstone’s assurances, that came from the all too familiar slick soothing words, “Don’t worry about it, I will take care of you”, some residents are finding, to their cost, that signing a 1st Priority contract may ultimately lead to the loss of their homes. Or what’s now left of them!
There are cases were Gladstone and the man he dubbed  ‘our friend’ - self proclaimed, Century Village Public Adjuster, Ken Hecht, obviously, didn’t take into account that a percentage of homeowner’s insurance carriers would refute some claims. Unfortunately, the discovery came after the ‘heads I win, tails you lose’, contracts had been signed and hammer happy 1st Priority had gutted the apartments.


In my opinion, outgoing President Loewenstein, with exquisite lack of sensitivity, gave a highly economical version of the truth at last Friday’s Delegate Assembly.He did little if, anything, to clarify the current situation, apart from laying the entire blame, like Gladstone, unfairly, against the county. He appeared to believe that the problem was solved now that, the suddenly magnanimous, 1st Priority had begun to ‘fix’ certain problems.Whilst this, like some of his statement, is partially true, he appeared oblivious that this sudden act of generosity from 1st Priority was being conducted whilst the company’s debt attorney attempted to collect money from, now,  destitute residents. 
At the moment three law firms are working on separate cases. Two victims now face the very serious possibility of losing their homes.I was informed late last week that one lawsuit has been filed against 1st Priority and class action status will be sought as soon as possible.
Without exception, the attorneys involved remain completely aghast at how this situation has ever been allowed to develop, let alone  reach this stage. Consequently, a lawsuit against UCO for negligence is under review.
 We are all now aware that the sanctimonious six - having been successful in disassociating UCO from the blog, will not demean themselves by reading this.Unless, of course, they may be tempted to subversively glance at the new blog for the protection of the sudden serge of new owners expected to deluge our community any day!
Should, which I doubt, this is the real reason, would it not have been wiser for them to leave this UCO communication door open to assist those who already live here? Isn’t charity supposed to start at home?What greater recommendation for any community than that of one with the humanity to own up to its mistakes, deal with them and show consideration and compassion to their neighbors?
Perhaps, once installed, the new administration, will ensure that once 1st Priority complete their outstanding contracts they are never allowed to work in this village again.
Perhaps too, the new administration should seriously consider calling an independent inquiry as to exactly how this situation was so blatantly allowed to arise, expose all those who were involved and report on what safeguards need to be put in place to ensure such a wretched situation is never allowed to happen again.
As for Dan Gladstone he now has the perfect opportunity to prove what he has always maintained, having the best interests of our community at heart. He needs to accept his defeat gracefully, accept his responsibility in this matter and finally, once and for all, get his priority’s right.



17 comments:

  1. From the desk of Peter Amato

    If the U.C.O. Reporter were not so heavily censored a great percentage
    of these problems would not have occurred.

    Sue Cohen I'm glad to see your full name is on what you wrote, an your not hiding behind a pseudonym

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Barbara,
    A committee for this very purpose should have been created when I strongly advised the officers and Insurance Committee to do so... almost three months ago. No negative reflection on Frank is intended.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Not a formal request for a motion to be made at an Insurance Committee meeting almost three months ago. It was more in the form of a suggestion with emphasis on immediate action.

    Reference post provided as follows:

    "What is the UCO Insurance Committee doing to help the owners of unfinished repair units. Anything at their January meeting??
    They could begin with Randall's suggestion (ignored at their December 16 meeting). I reprint it per Randall's post "I thought that my suggestion of an oversight sub-committee of the Insurance Committee to monitor the progress (or lack of it) on units which are repaired after casualty through UCO efforts, was a reasonable one. Got shotdown without a moment of consideration. Wonder how many elderly owners are sitting in hotel rooms this moment wondering whether they'll be home for Christmas? Am I alone in my thinking?"

    I haven't attended an Insurance Committee Meeting since that time.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks Sue, I also noticed last Friday that G. Loewenstein skated by glossing things over and blaming the permit dept. Even tho' he had been to the permit dept he gave no numbers. I believe of 170 problems only 33 had permits and of those only 26 have inspections remaining.
    I would like to see more numbers when available:
    How many months Gladstone, Karpf, and Loewenstein knew there were major problems with 1st Priority, and did not tell the village (since June '09?)
    How many 1st Priority customers are still unable to occupy their condos? etc.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Barbara, its not posted is it!. I went to Dec mtg. I never found January mtg. If you find mtg dates or read minutes at UCO please let us know. TIA

    ReplyDelete
  10. Attorneys ask - Why were 1st Priority problems allowed to develop into disaster.
    There were many months of cover up at UCO.
    December '09 the Insurance Cmte clued in that Gladstone should not send everyone to one company, they suggested three.
    Still, at this time suggestions were ignored, whistle blowers were shut up and threatened with law suits.
    Feb 2010, more of the same, making the news pretty to get election votes.
    March, while dedicated people collect the facts, UCO still glosses over the whole situation.
    With a new President - No more heads in the sand!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Barbara (re your first comment)that is fine idea, but that may be too much of a load for Officers, however UCO is in an excellent position with authority for gathering all the data.
    IMHO every victim needs a lawyer to sue:

    Gladstone, Dan
    1st Priority Restoration
    MC Enterprises of S. Florida
    Hecht Consulting Group
    Chamudes, Jorge A
    and a friend to help them register complaints to:
    State Attorney
    State Financial Services, Insurance Fraud
    Seniors V Crime
    Complaints to BB
    Complaints to DBPR Construction -related
    Complaints to PB PZ&B per complete strip down jobs w/no permits
    http://www.illegalcontractors.com/index.php
    etc. ad infinitum

    ReplyDelete
  12. Wake up little Susie, wake up…
    What defeat are you talking about? In spite of your continuous hate messages 50% of the Village voted for me!!!
    Sorry no other comments because of legal proceedings.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Dan: Half the village did not vote for you, only a few of the big buildings with more than one delegate vote and silly uninformed presidents.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Dan,
    Thank you for your message.
    I’m afraid the only legal proceedings I’m aware of at this time are those filed on March 1st 502010CA005411XXXX MB. Should you care to check you will find your name there not mine!

    ReplyDelete
  15. from Peter Amato

    Sue

    Can you give any of the details on the march 1 filing

    ReplyDelete
  16. Certainly, Mr. Amato
    The lawsuit was filed at Palm Beach County Court on March 1st.
    The plaintiff is a resident of my building, Southampton B, who was 'persuaded' to sign a contract with 1st Priority, by Dan Gladstone, and has been out of his home since last September.
    The defendants are: 1st Priority Restoration, MC Enterprises and their contractor Jorge Chamudes, Dan Gladstone , Hecht Corporation and the owner of the apartment above who also had his apartment gutted on the recommendation of 1st Priority and Dan Gladstone,
    All court records are open and available to the general public online or by a visit to the courthouse.
    How sad that the only thing Gladstone reflected on, from the entire, posting was the word defeat. No matter how he may wish to redefine the dictionary losing an election is defeat not dewin!

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.