-
Below is yet another lawyer letter from Ms. Sutofsky's attorney. So what is different about this demand; the phrase "original records" has been removed. Original records is a non-starter, as they leave the door open to alterations with no audit trail. So, with this issue resolved, UCO shall, as we did after the election of March, 2014, copy and release to any interested party, every scrap of paper generated in the March 2015 election. This production of copies is in accord with the UCO attorneys advice.
-
-
Dave Israel
-
As has been posted in Gary's blog (as he is too lazy to remove it)---poor demented Esther.
ReplyDeleteEsther is just a poor loser. She doesn't realize that name calling does not adhere her to the people in the Village.
ReplyDelete"IF YOU CAN'T GET IN THE HENHOUSE, GET THE HENHOUSE TO COME TO YOU"
ReplyDelete—Reynard
Esther's attorney saying she wanted to have the originals of the ballots from the March election to count sounds like the Fox disputing the count of the chickens with the Farmer. "Send them out to me, and let me count them," said the Fox through her attorney.
"Not quite," my friend, said the Farmer. "But I will send you one feather from each chick, and you can count them."
"But, but," spluttered the Fox. "How will I know you didn't . . . "
However, that was how the matter had to be left, whilst the Fox's attorney, who was making more money for her efforts but getting a little tired of the ordeal, fired off another letter of largely "unprovables" to the Farmer, intended mainly for the Farmer's friends, who might think ill of him the more in this vein they heard.
are they paying for the wasted paper?
ReplyDeleteHi Bob,
ReplyDeleteApril 24, 2015 at 6:04 AM,
The distribution will be electronic. the data will be scanned to the Google Cloud; and the link will be Emailed to all Email addresses on our list.
Hard copy will be provided to anyone so requesting at actual UCO cost.
The package is almost ready, it is 299 pages and 1.2Gbyte.
Dave Israel