This Is our Village

Sunday, July 21, 2013

a couple points... and then some!

1. As long as unit owners don't get involved, people like the malcontents will go on scaring people into believing falsehoods. Accusations of David Israel bankrupting Century Village are rampant. I don't know where they get their information, but I've seen the treasurers reports given at the Delegate meetings and nowhere does it show Century Village being bankrupt or even close to it. I recall the Treasurer denying the Bankruptcy accusations on more than one occasion. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2.The by laws clearly say the residency requirements for all officers, yet they get ignored. My proposal on the requirements only made it possible to PROVE residency, but it has been twisted into a personal vendetta. Yes, the Treasurer is believed to fall into that category at this time, and some question John Gluzack's residency also. John happens to be away due to a medical issue that can not be done here (so I am told) and I can not fault a medical issue unless it will keep him away for an unreasonable amount of time, who decides what an unreasonable amount of time? That should probably go through the normal channels, But to be an officer here and live elsewhere is inexcusable. Just having your name on a deed doesn't hold water if you do not live there nine months out of the year. I totally understand that the Treasurer has many friends here and that she does a good job. Doing a good job may be enough for some, but the by law requiring residency was put there for ALL not for some. should there be something on the books about a medical issue? I believe there is, depending on interpretation, if some one is incapacitated. Is John incapacitated or is he away for treatment? The way I understand it is that he is away for treatment, not incapacitated. All in all, that is for the officers, executive board and delegates to decide. Would he be living in Century Village had he not gone for treatment? Is he returning after his treatment? These are the questions that need to be asked. He did not buy a place down the road and kept his job here. Different situation. What his ailment is, is his business. I understand it to be legitimate, and I only hope his treatment is successful and he returns soon. My prayers are with him and hopefully yours as well. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ My offer to resign is withdrawn... Malcontents, deal with it. say what you want about me, call me crazy, call me deranged, whatever. All you did was piss me off. I will do ALL I can to do what's right for CV. like it or not. If you people have proof, present it or be quiet. I presented proof. dispute it.

8 comments:

  1. I'm confused! My understanding was that you resigned from the UCO Reporter immediately and that you will resign from your position on the Executive Board in 30 days. Now I read that you will resign if asked to by the Executive Board! Did I misunderstand?

    ReplyDelete
  2. i offered my resignation...if they except it, i am gone. simple

    ReplyDelete
  3. I resigned from the reporter, when I came back to turn in my key, they asked for my help and I gave it. a last act there.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm sorry that you are leaving the Reporter. I will miss you and Sadie. The Reporter doesn't seem to get too involved with UCO politics so I don't understand why you feel you have to quit the Reporter.

    ReplyDelete
  5. you can thank edwardo and olga, but they just made me realize that resigning would be a big mistake and allow olga's comrade on the board. Unfortunately for that person, the mouths of his comrades went just a little too far and I will stay and fight for the people that elected me. I am not going to give in now. I will continue to fight for what is right. I don't care what they say about me, I think the people of CV are smarter than listening to the demented ramblings of those two. I challenged them to bring forth proof. if not, be quiet. I published proof on here for what I believe, let them do the same and not slander my name further.

    ReplyDelete
  6. want to hear the funny part? Jerry Karpf is the one that would've taken my place, and I really have nothing against him other than his association with Olga, which I readily admit is a person that I do not like for what she said in the Reporter Office.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I noticed that NO proof has been shown by the opposition. Need I say more? Nothing but a lot of hot air. Their only response is to try to further slander me. No proof. One can only hope that they will wake up from their manchurian nightmare and try to do some good for CV.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.